Under the law, United States money as identified above is a valid and legal offer of payment for antecedent debts when tendered to a creditor.
2.
The Court of King's Bench gradually accepted that the subsequent promise did not need not be proven : the defendant's alleged promise to pay the antecedent debt would be supplied by law.
3.
The case states that they were handed over in payment of antecedent debts, and, if so, they became the property of the defendants, and the whole beneficial interest passed in the first instance to them; but then it is said, that they were given on a condition, that the defendants were to debit themselves with so much only as they should receive from the assignees.
मोबाइल